Sage Amelia

Living Anthroposophy

  • Blog
  • About Amelia
  • Anthroposophy
  • Links
  • More Links
  • Archive

My Manichaean Motto

April 12, 2014 By Amelia Leave a Comment

Phoenix 348-367

Those of us who transform acts of evil into capacities for healing, we are warriors. We gather strength today for tomorrow’s battle against evil. We develop capacities of redemption. We should not underestimate the power and courage we gain just by living through and to varying degrees overcoming the effects of others’ evil deeds. That which is experienced has effects which work deeply into the will of the future. What now seems to be a difficult destiny will shine forth in the future as a pillar of resolution to defend the good.

pieta

 

Filed Under: Anthroposophy, Self-Development, Uncategorized Tagged With: evil, good, Manichaean

Torture

April 11, 2014 By Amelia Leave a Comment

Is it possible to be more precise about what happens to the sheaths due to torture, ending in death or not? Is the ego more bound to the physical body? Is the astral body too deeply impressing on the etheric? Is the etheric cut off from its own life forces?

Many sufferers of torture and abuse dissociate to cope with their unbearable situation. What happens to the sheaths during this dissociation? Does the ego withdraw so that the unbearable pain is not felt? If so, “who” digests the pain instead of the ego? What being holds the “experiencing” of the torture? What are the further implications of this dissociation for the remaining life of the individual involved? What can bring about a reunification of the individual with their complete life narrative? What does it mean for the “I” to have lost continuity of its incarnational experience?

Is torture and severe abuse, in this sense, an attack on the ”I,” –an asuric assault?

torture

Human actions that are evil and are also freely carried out–these are deeds of evil that require quick transformation, and also social healing. In the face of pure evil, a man cannot fight alone; he must have helpers both incarnate and disincarnate at his side. When two or more gather in His name, much can be redeemed. We are our brother’s keeper. May we bring both compassion and clarity to those who suffer! May we be willing to take up the karma of another! May we cultivate the selflessness that allows the better good for the community to arise! And may we commit to the deeds and processes through time that are required to bring about true social healing!

Filed Under: Anthroposophy, Uncategorized Tagged With: asuras, evil, I, spiritual bodies

On Matter

April 11, 2014 By Amelia Leave a Comment

Carbon atom

Carbon atom

 

Matter is Spirit incarnate. Matter can turn into Spirit. Spirit can turn into matter. We know from modern experiments in physics, that the behavior of the tiniest constituents of matter changes based on the presence of the observer. Certain subatomic particles seem able to influence each other across vast distances, and be in more than one place at one time. Physicists can’t really describe these subatomic particles as matter–they are activity, waveforms, potentials. They embody interactive dynamics.

Thought is spiritual activity. There is a world of thought-forms so to speak, and there is the world of archetypes. From these thought-forms, forces are drawn in or attracted which can result in a process of materialization under certain conditions. When mankind has learnt to understand the lawful processes that underlie these transformations, he is able to bring matter into creation, either experimentally/with mechanical or chemical processes, or eventually through the forces of thought itself.

There are already those who have been able to manifest matter through inner processes of thought and meditation. Although I have not seen this in person, I do believe the manifestations to be true in some instances.

It seems to me that it is just a matter of time before certain groups acquire such knowledge. So the urgent question lies in the development of selflessness.

The particular instance I have been aware of where materialization took place, was done in selflessness, in pursuit of truth, and in line with the individual’s earthly spiritual work. I imagine it is because of her particular karma that she was able to do so. She has not continued to manifest, since that is not the point of her work.  One must have an inner dedication and love to the material involved for the secrets of its manifestation to be made accessible to one, I imagine. To me, this implies lifetimes of true seeking into the inner working of involution/materialization. It is not something any old person can do. Yet the time will come, when mankind will approach ever closer to these secrets. Already, we can blast atoms apart, and even blast subatomic particles apart. This is power indeed. Clearly, there is an urgent need for the development of a structure of ethics around using such forces.

Also, those who work with biodynamics and healing, are becoming conversant in the processes of spirit into matter and matter into spirit.

Matter is a gift to humankind; it enables our development. We must learn to give it the respect and gratitude it deserves, and to hold the sanctity of its creation. A time will come when humankind no longer needs the resistance of solid matter; then, other realms of experience will provide a basis for our conscious existence.

Filed Under: Anthroposophy, Uncategorized Tagged With: manifestation, matter, spirit

Thoughts on Destructive Forces in the I

April 11, 2014 By Amelia Leave a Comment

forging steel

I offer up my ruminations today on Rudolf Steiner’s lecture on Evil and the Power of Thought At the Center of Man’s Being, the lecture quoted in the last post and found here.

The ego is forged out of forces of destruction. There is a very fury of destruction and chaos within each of us, and we owe the development of our “I” to that power. Only through this power of destruction are thoughts able to enter in and “kill” our etheric body, thus giving us the capacity for consciousness, which in turn offers us a realm for freedom.

We must learn to know this center of destruction within us. We must not allow it to extrude itself into outer civilization, causing evil and chaos.

We must learn to understand, even to love, this force of destruction within us. For without it, we would not be developing our “I,” and thus would never attain consciousness in spiritual worlds. There is a paradox Steiner presents. The ego must be forged out of these forces of destruction, yet this ego cannot enter spiritual realms. It must be completely sacrificed. Only the ego permeated with love is able to live in spiritual realities. Yet only that which has been carefully built up is worthy of sacrifice. Thus, we must with great effort build up a strong vessel out of the forces of destruction, then completely empty out this vessel, and offer up the vessel in love to the spiritual world. This is true spiritual alchemy.

Steiner also refers to a great mystery: “Spirit must exist, and for the sake of the maintenance of the spirit matter may be extinguished.” I believe this can also be taken on a very literal level. Matter exists as a realm for beings to evolve and develop; it exists as an arena for humans to develop their “I.” There is a very palpable sense of resistance in the very nature of the material world. Yet materialism must be overcome if we are to ascend to spiritual worlds. Matter may be extinguished for the preservation of spirit, quite literally. I believe that the human being contains within his developing ego the power of nuclear fission, the power to obliterate matter (and along with this, the power of creation). This power will become readily available within individual human beings only in the very far distant future, yet the forces of destruction already have the upper hand in earthly evolution, and will continue to increase. In order to ensure that these forces can lead humanity to ascent, we must fully develop the forces of love. We must consciously dedicate as much energy to building up moral forces as we do to building up consciousness itself; each act of cognition must become an act of love.

A time will come in the far distant future when the earth as we know it will require dissolution. We will participate in the destruction of our universe as we know it. Yet this destruction is necessary for a new form of existence which will allow future evolution and progress. Powers of destruction are just as important as powers of growth and life. Without the obliteration of the past in every moment, the future could not come into being in the present.

We must learn to love evil, for it creates the ground upon which we launch consciously into other realms. Only through transforming evil do we attain the power of creating good.

Filed Under: Anthroposophy, Self-Development, Uncategorized Tagged With: destruction, ego, evil, I

Ask the Dead

April 11, 2014 By Amelia Leave a Comment

cemetery prayer

I came upon the following while wandering on the web, and thought I would share it. I believe it is by Carl Unger.

Ask the Dead

A second bridge between the living and the dead is based on the possibility of asking questions of a departed soul and receiving answers. The questions must be of a soul-spiritual nature, not of a materialistic kind. It is best to entertain the question when one goes to sleep, but it can also be done during the day. The answer comes into one’s heart upon awaking the next day, or a few days later. To be effective, this process requires a mental procedure which is not easy, but can be learned by practice. Rudolf Steiner describes this in a most remarkable lecture he gave in Bern, Switzerland, on November 9, 1916 (GA 168). [See also Steiner’s lecture of February 5, 1918 ? e.Ed.] To ask a question, one has to imagine the dead person as one knew him or her in life, and one has to imagine that he or she speaks the question to oneself. This is the reverse of what one would naturally be inclined to do. One would be inclined to imagine that one asks the question oneself by addressing the image of the departed person’s soul. That would be completely ineffective. One has to imagine that the image of the dead person speaks the question to us, and then let go. Then the next morning, or one of the mornings following, one feels the answer rising up out of one’s own heart upon awaking. This is where the dead person has planted the answer, as it were.

Of course, knowing just a little psychology will tell you that a lot of ideas and impulses can rise up out of a person’s heart, that are mostly merely products of our own wishful thinking. One has to learn to recognize the qualitative difference between such personal messages from one’s own heart and the answers that come from a departed soul. In the process of learning to recognize this difference, one is likely at first to make mistakes. But by practice and sensitive inner observation one can gain certainty in this field. I don’t write this as a theory. It is my experience that it works and can bring significant enrichment to one’s life and to the life of the departed soul.

This being so, I am surprised that hardly any friends ask questions of Rudolf Steiner in this way. One objection may be the belief that he is again in incarnation, hence no longer among the dead to. receive one’s questions. However, one should consider that an Initiate of his high stature is conscious of the world of the dead, regardless of whether he is incarnated or not. Therefore I consider this objection invalid. Another objection may be that he stated that one can ask questions only of dead persons one has known in life, and most living persons, including myself, have not known him personally. However, he also stated that the equivalent of a personal connection can be established by getting to know some very personal aspects of the dead person’s life, for example his handwriting. By reading Rudolf Steiner’s autobiography as well as accounts of many people who have met him and have worked with him, and by studying his literary and artistic output, one can actually achieve a degree of acquaintance with him that goes deeper than what one would have acquired by meeting him personally in life. Given this deeper acquaintance, this second objection is invalidated. There remains the possibility of a third objection. One may fear that one may become dependent on Rudolf Steiner in a way that encroaches upon one’s freedom because his answers would be planted in one’s heart rather than being placed before one like a book. This objection is based on a misconception that sprouts from unjustified fear. One should remember his statements that modern Initiates are the greatest respecters of a person’s freedom and independence, and that he never wants to dominate, but rather be a counselor and a friend. That means that his answers are always in the form of suggestions of possibilities and clarifying insights. If one gives proper weight to these statements the third objection appears to be groundless.

If someone says that he or she has consulted with Rudolf Steiner and he said that this or that must be done, one can right away discard such a message, for it violates the conditions just mentioned. Any advice that rises up from the heart as an answer from the dead is never compulsive. Therefore any objection like the third one mentioned is invalid.

~Carl Unger

Filed Under: Anthroposophy, Uncategorized Tagged With: communication, dead

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Recent Posts

  • Earth
  • Ancient Moon
  • Ancient Sun
  • Ancient Saturn
  • Cosmic Evolution Imaginations

© 2017 Amelia Golden Log in

Cleantalk Pixel